Cross-Polarization
The Unwanted Orthogonal Component
Cross-Pol Performance by Antenna Type
| Antenna Type | XPD at Boresight | XPD at −3 dB Edge | Primary Cross-Pol Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rectangular patch | −20 to −25 dB | −12 to −18 dB | Higher-order modes at edges |
| Corrugated horn | −35 to −45 dB | −30 to −35 dB | HE11 mode purity |
| Smooth-wall horn | −20 to −30 dB | −15 to −20 dB | TE/TM mode imbalance |
| Symmetric dish (f/D=0.4) | −25 to −30 dB | −15 to −20 dB | Reflector geometry (curvature) |
| Offset dish (shaped) | −30 to −40 dB | −25 to −30 dB | Feed tilt compensation |
| Phased array (broadside) | −25 to −35 dB | −15 to −25 dB | Element coupling, scan-induced |
XPD(θ, φ) = |Eco(θ, φ)|² / |Ecross(θ, φ)|² (in dB)
System XPD for dual-pol frequency reuse:
XPDsystem = XPDTX antenna + XPDpropagation + XPDRX antenna
(each term in dB, combined as power ratios)
Ku-band satellite requirement: system XPD ≥ 25 dB for dual-pol reuse. With 33 dB satellite antenna, 27 dB propagation (rain), 30 dB earth station: XPDsys = 25.5 dB ✓
Frequently Asked Questions
Why does cross-pol matter for frequency reuse?
Dual-pol satellite systems transmit two independent signals on orthogonal polarizations at the same frequency. System XPD determines the cross-channel interference. Ku-band requires ≥25 dB XPD for this to work. If XPD degrades (e.g., in heavy rain), the cross-pol interference rises and the modulation order must be reduced.
What causes cross-pol in a parabolic reflector?
The curvature tilts off-axis ray polarization vectors in the intercardinal planes. Deeper dishes (lower f/D) are worse: f/D = 0.3 gives ~20 dB XPD, f/D = 0.5 gives 30+ dB. Offset reflectors with matched feed tilt can cancel this geometric effect.
How is cross-pol measured?
In an anechoic chamber: measure with source aligned (co-pol pattern), then rotate source 90° (cross-pol pattern). XPD is the dB difference at each angle. For CP antennas, use the spin-linear technique to separate RHCP and LHCP components.