Cable Loss
Where Your Signal Disappears
Cable Loss Comparison at Key Frequencies
| Cable Type | Diameter | Loss at 900 MHz | Loss at 2.4 GHz | Loss at 5.8 GHz | Typical Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RG-58 | 5 mm | 0.28 dB/m | 0.62 dB/m | 1.10 dB/m | Lab bench, short jumpers |
| RG-213 | 10 mm | 0.13 dB/m | 0.26 dB/m | 0.46 dB/m | Amateur radio, HF/VHF |
| LMR-240 | 6 mm | 0.14 dB/m | 0.25 dB/m | 0.42 dB/m | Short WLAN, indoor runs |
| LMR-400 | 10 mm | 0.07 dB/m | 0.13 dB/m | 0.22 dB/m | Outdoor antenna feeds |
| 7/8" Hardline | 22 mm | 0.03 dB/m | 0.05 dB/m | 0.08 dB/m | Cell tower, broadcast |
| WR-90 waveguide | 23 × 10 mm | N/A | N/A | 0.04 dB/m | X-band radar feed |
Calculating Total System Loss
Losstotal = (αcable × Length) + (Nconnectors × Lossconnector)
Example: 50 m cell tower run at 1.9 GHz:
LMR-400: 0.10 dB/m × 50 m = 5.0 dB + 2 × 0.1 dB (N-type) = 5.2 dB
7/8" hardline: 0.04 dB/m × 50 m = 2.0 dB + 2 × 0.05 dB (7-16 DIN) = 2.1 dB
The 3.1 dB difference means the hardline delivers twice the power to the antenna. For a 20 W transmitter: LMR-400 delivers 6.0 W; hardline delivers 12.3 W. That is a 3 dB coverage radius improvement.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why does loss increase with frequency?
Conductor loss rises as √f (skin effect forces current into a thinner surface layer, increasing resistance). Dielectric loss rises linearly with f (molecular friction in the insulator). Below ~1 GHz, conductor loss dominates. Above that, dielectric loss takes over, which is why premium cables use air or expanded PTFE dielectrics.
How do I estimate total loss?
Multiply dB/m at your frequency by cable length, then add connector losses (0.05 to 0.3 dB each depending on type). A 30 m LMR-400 run at 2.4 GHz: 0.22 × 30 + 0.2 = 6.8 dB total. Only 21% of power reaches the antenna.
When to switch from coax to waveguide?
Above ~10 GHz, even semi-rigid coax loses 1 to 2 dB/m. Waveguide is 10 to 20× lower loss (0.05 to 0.2 dB/m). For runs over 1 meter above 20 GHz, waveguide is almost always required. Trade-off: rigid, heavy, frequency-specific sizing.