Body Area Network
Understanding Body Area Networks
BANs operate in a unique propagation environment: the human body is a lossy dielectric medium that absorbs, reflects, and scatters RF energy. On-body channels (wrist to chest, for example) experience 30-80 dB path loss at 2.4 GHz, with large variations due to body posture and movement. In-body channels (implant to external) suffer 3-10 dB/cm tissue attenuation, favoring lower frequencies (MICS band, 402-405 MHz).
SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) limits are critical: FCC limits SAR to 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue. BAN devices operate at very low power (typically −10 to 0 dBm TX) to meet SAR limits and extend battery life of implanted devices to 5-10 years.
PL = 30-80 dB (posture dependent)
TX: 0 dBm, RX sens: −90 dBm
Margin: 10-60 dB
In-body (MICS, 5 cm depth):
PL = 40-60 dB (tissue + antenna)
TX: −16 dBm (SAR limited)
BAN PHY Comparison
| PHY | Frequency | Data Rate | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Narrowband | 400/900/2400 MHz | 75-971 kbps | General on-body |
| UWB | 3.1-10.6 GHz | 0.5-15 Mbps | High-rate imaging |
| HBC | 10-50 MHz | 164 kbps | Touch-based pairing |
| MICS | 402-405 MHz | 200-800 kbps | Implants |
Frequently Asked Questions
IEEE 802.15.6?
WBAN standard: Narrowband, UWB, HBC PHYs. Medical QoS, security for health data, optimized for body propagation.
Propagation?
On-body: 30-80 dB at 2.4 GHz, posture dependent. In-body: 3-10 dB/cm tissue loss. MICS (402 MHz) best for implants.
BAN vs BLE?
BLE dominates consumer wearables. 802.15.6 for clinical QoS and implants. BLE lacks in-body PHY and medical QoS.