Why does a binomial array have no sidelobes?

The binomial array achieves zero sidelobes through mathematical elegance. The array factor of an N-element uniform array is AF = sin(N*psi/2) / sin(psi/2), where psi = k*d*cos(theta) + beta. This function has N-2 sidelobes. The binomial array's excitation coefficients are the binomial expansion of (1 + z)^(N-1), which factors the array polynomial into (N-1) identical roots at z = -1. This means the array factor becomes AF = (1 + e^(j*psi))^(N-1) = (2*cos(psi/2))^(N-1) * e^(j*(N-1)*psi/2). The magnitude is |AF| = |2*cos(psi/2)|^(N-1). For element spacing d = lambda/2, the visible region spans psi from -pi to +pi. The function cos^(N-1)(psi/2) is monotonically decreasing from its maximum at psi=0 to zero at psi=+/-pi, with no local maxima (sidelobes) in between. The zero-sidelobe property holds only for d lambda/2, the visible region extends beyond +/-pi, and sidelobes from repeated periods appear as grating lobes.

How does the binomial array compare to Dolph-Chebyshev and Taylor arrays?

Three amplitude taper distributions represent different sidelobe-beamwidth trade-offs. Uniform array: all elements have equal excitation. Narrowest main beam (highest directivity for given N) but highest sidelobes at -13.2 dB for large N. Array factor follows sinc-like pattern. Binomial array: excitation follows binomial coefficients. Zero sidelobes but widest main beam. Beamwidth penalty increases with N. For N=8 at d=lambda/2: beamwidth is approximately 1.75 times the uniform array. Impractical for large N due to extreme amplitude ratios (center-to-edge ratio = C(N-1,(N-1)/2) which grows as 2^(N-1)/sqrt(N)). For N=10: ratio is 126:1 (42 dB). Dolph-Chebyshev array: optimal distribution that achieves the narrowest beamwidth for a specified sidelobe level, or equivalently, the lowest sidelobes for a given beamwidth. Uses Chebyshev polynomials to produce equi-ripple sidelobes at a specified level (e.g., -30 dB). Most practical for real systems. Taylor distribution: a modified approach that specifies sidelobe level for the first few sidelobes and allows the far-out sidelobes to decay naturally (1/u envelope). More practical than Dolph-Chebyshev for continuous apertures and avoids the Gibbs phenomenon at aperture edges.

What are the practical limitations of binomial arrays?

Several factors limit binomial array use to small arrays and theoretical benchmarking. Amplitude dynamic range: the ratio between the strongest (center) and weakest (edge) element excitations grows exponentially with array size. For N=5: weights are 1:4:6:4:1 (ratio 6:1, 15.6 dB). For N=8: weights are 1:7:21:35:35:21:7:1 (ratio 35:1, 30.9 dB). For N=16: center-to-edge ratio exceeds 6000:1 (75.6 dB). This requires feed network power dividers with extreme split ratios and amplifiers with very different output powers, increasing cost and complexity. Beamwidth penalty: the zero-sidelobe constraint forces the main beam to be wider than necessary for many applications. A Dolph-Chebyshev array with -40 dB sidelobes achieves near-zero visible sidelobes with a beamwidth only 20-30% wider than uniform, versus the binomial's 50-100% penalty for large N. Sensitivity to errors: the steep amplitude taper makes the binomial pattern very sensitive to excitation errors. A 1 dB amplitude error on the weakest edge elements barely affects the pattern, but 1 dB error on the strong center elements significantly broadens the beam. Phase errors of 10 degrees on any element can raise sidelobe levels from zero to -25 to -30 dB, negating the binomial advantage. Practical application: binomial weighting is primarily used in educational contexts and as a limiting case for taper design. Real arrays use Taylor or Dolph-Chebyshev distributions that balance sidelobe suppression against beamwidth and implementation complexity.

Antenna / Array Theory

Binomial Array

/by-NOH-mee-ul uh-RAY/

Linear antenna array with element amplitudes following binomial coefficients C(N−1, n), producing a radiation pattern with zero sidelobes for d ≤ λ/2. Array factor: |AF| = |2cos(ψ/2)|^N−1. Achieves maximum sidelobe suppression at the cost of wider main beam and extreme center-to-edge amplitude ratios for large N.

Sidelobes: Zero (d ≤ λ/2)

Beamwidth: Widest of all tapers

Practical: N ≤ 8 typically

Understanding Binomial Arrays

The binomial array represents one extreme of the sidelobe-beamwidth trade-off in antenna array design. By weighting element excitations according to binomial coefficients, the array factor becomes a pure cosine power function with no subsidiary maxima. This zero-sidelobe property is mathematically guaranteed for element spacings at or below half a wavelength.

The trade-off is significant: the main beam is wider than any other taper for the same number of elements, and the amplitude dynamic range between center and edge elements grows exponentially with array size. For arrays beyond 8 elements, the required amplitude ratios become impractical, making the binomial array primarily a theoretical benchmark rather than a production design.

Array Factor and Excitation Weights

Array Factor (N elements, d = λ/2):
|AF| = |2cos(ψ/2)|^N−1
ψ = kd·cosθ + β

Binomial Weights (Pascal's Triangle):
N=4: 1 : 3 : 3 : 1 (ratio 3:1, 9.5 dB)
N=5: 1 : 4 : 6 : 4 : 1 (ratio 6:1, 15.6 dB)
N=8: 1:7:21:35:35:21:7:1 (ratio 35:1, 30.9 dB)
N=16: ratio > 6000:1 (75.6 dB)

Amplitude Taper Comparison

Distribution	Sidelobe Level	Beamwidth (rel.)	Amplitude Ratio (N=8)	Optimality
Uniform	−13.2 dB	1.00×	1:1 (0 dB)	Max directivity
Dolph-Chebyshev	Specified (equi-ripple)	~1.2–1.4×	Depends on SLL	Optimal BW for SLL
Taylor	Near-in specified	~1.2–1.5×	Moderate	Practical aperture
Binomial	Zero (−∞ dB)	~1.75×	35:1 (30.9 dB)	Max SLL suppression

Binomial Weight Examples

N	Weights	Center:Edge Ratio	Dynamic Range
3	1 : 2 : 1	2:1	6.0 dB
5	1 : 4 : 6 : 4 : 1	6:1	15.6 dB
8	1:7:21:35:35:21:7:1	35:1	30.9 dB
10	1:9:36:84:126:...	126:1	42.0 dB

Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

Why zero sidelobes?

Binomial coefficients factor the array polynomial into identical roots, producing |AF| = |cos(ψ/2)|^N−1, monotonically decreasing with no local maxima. Holds for d ≤ λ/2; grating lobes appear for wider spacing.

Binomial vs. Dolph-Chebyshev?

Binomial: zero sidelobes, widest beam, extreme amplitude ratios. Dolph-Chebyshev: specified equi-ripple SLL, narrower beam, practical ratios. For −40 dB SLL, Chebyshev is only 20–30% wider than uniform vs. 75%+ for binomial.

Practical limitations?

Amplitude ratio grows as 2^N−1/√N. N=16 needs 75.6 dB dynamic range, impractical for feed networks. 10° phase errors raise sidelobes to −25 dB, negating the advantage. Used mainly as theoretical benchmark; real arrays use Taylor or Chebyshev tapers.

Related Terms

← Binder Jetting Binomial Transformer →

Array Design

Precision RF Components

RF Essentials provides precision terminations and custom RF assemblies for antenna array prototyping, feed network characterization, and amplitude taper verification.

Request a Quote